Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1795

reference
246-tree-1
name
1795
tree-preservation-order

undefined

246-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.000809 50.855761)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.000752 50.855755,-1.000755 50.855766,-1.000763 50.855776,-1.000775 50.855784,-1.000791 50.855789,-1.000808 50.855791,-1.000826 50.855790,-1.000842 50.855785,-1.000855 50.855777,-1.000863 50.855767,-1.000866 50.855756,-1.000863 50.855745,-1.000856 50.855735,-1.000843 50.855727,-1.000827 50.855721,-1.000810 50.855719,-1.000792 50.855721,-1.000776 50.855726,-1.000764 50.855734,-1.000755 50.855744,-1.000752 50.855755)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL